Monday, November 30, 2015 • 11:32

Fire district drops ball in keeping community informed

May 22, 2013
Former fire board member and multiple board president Mel Schuler was right to give a scorching dressing down to the current board and administration for dropping the ball in informing the public that it was going to vote Thursday night whether to drop its current contract with Cal Fire and sign a new contract with the San Pasqual Tribal Fire Department.

I was pretty fumed about it myself. I heard about the press briefing that scheduled for Thursday on Tuesday when we were about to put that week's paper to bed. The press briefing was too late in the week to make that paper, and just in time to make the next paper. Which gave our readers several hours to read about it before the meeting happened. Now that's what I call transparency!

Back in the days when Schuler was board president and former director Dan Thornton was treasurer they would often get together with me a couple of weeks before an important meeting so that we could prepare the ground by informing our readers. The theory was that the better informed the public was, the better decision the board would make. Those days are gone, I guess.

The water district boardroom, which VCFPD rents from VCMWD once a month, was pretty nearly filled to capacity with about 100 people, who were remarkably well behaved. Put that down to the presence of three Sheriff's deputies from the VC station. However, several members of the audience did shout out "Listen to the community!" Nobody threw any chairs, however.

This was an audience representative of the community if more than 50% of community happens to be members of the firefighting industry or people who have a vested interest in keeping Cal Fire in charge in Valley Center. That doesn't make their opinions any the less valuable, however, I think most taxpayers in the Valley would be more comfortable if the fire board listens to a group of residents who are more demographically diverse. It would behoove those residents who are NOT firefighters to show up for the June meeting, just to even things out.

Let's not kid ourselves; the Cal Fire union packed Thursday's meeting because the issue of who runs Valley Center's fire department is an issue of JOBS and MONEY and POWER.

First, the jobs. Cal Fire is the largest fire department in the world. It is being impacted by the ongoing California budget crisis, just like other agencies. But unlike other state agencies, Cal Fire has a herd of milch cows that it can tap. These cows are the various independent fire agencies up and down the state. In San Diego the County Fire Authority and Cal Fire are different sides of the same coin. It is obvious from the pressure that the Fire Authority is putting on independent agencies such as the Palomar Mountain Volunteers and now VCFPD that it wants those jobs for its members.

Now the money. The aforementioned districts also have their own independent sources of money that the Fire Authority/Cal Fire would like to redirect into its own coffers. This will spend the end to all local control.

Now the power. Everybody wants it. Some people want to keep the power over their own fates. Others, like the Fire Authority and the County, want to accumulate as much power as they can over others. It's human nature.

So, if you look at the issue of the VCFPD contract in terms of money, power and jobs, the picture becomes quite clear.

  1. print email
    Volunteer Fire Dept in an At Risk Area
    May 22, 2013 | 10:43 PM

    The two major VC fires we have experienced ... 2003 and 2007, are clear indications that any reduced level of coverage puts all of us at risk. Who is making this decision and why are we (homeowners and taxpayers) who foot the bill not a part of this discussion?

    Anamaria Repetti
  2. print email
    Don't Panic
    May 23, 2013 | 10:25 AM

    Giving the public short notice about the staffing change was a mistake, but the staffing change itself was not. What else should Cal Fire have expected when they boosted their fees and wanted to impose severe restrictions on local organizations? The new staff are still trained, experienced firefighters who are certainly capable of handling local emergencies. Citing the 2003 and 2007 fires as examples that we're now more "at risk" is a specious statement--those fires involved scores more firefighters, units and resources than just the Wohlford Road fire station.

    Kevin Smith
  3. print email
    Fire Insurance
    May 24, 2013 | 07:09 PM

    Has anyone else been denied homeowner's insurance renewal right after the meeting? We received a call that informed us we no longer can get insurance from the company that has insured our home for 12 years because of the fire department change. They stated we no longer had a fire department within 5 miles of our home.

    Has anyone checked in to how it will affect the community's ability to get homeowner's insurance? How did the insurance company get information that isn't even settled yet?

    J Leduc
Reader Feedback Submission
Use this form to submit Reader Feedback. Your submission will be reviewed by our staff before appearing on the Web site.
* required value
Your Name*

Email (not shown on website)*




| About us | Contact us | Advertise | Subscribe | Roadrunner Publications, Inc. |