Valley Roadrunner Online Search


 

 

 

 

COP SERIES


A Q&A with Valley Center's top cop – Part 1

Lt. Sean Gerrity, commander of the Valley Center Sheriff’s Substation, was recently interviewed by college student John Fawkes. We thought our readers would be interested in some of his answers to Fawkes’s questions.
We’ll be presenting them in a series over the next few weeks.
* * *
Q: What is the process for being promoted in the Sheriff’s Department?

A: This differs, depending on the position and rank. We have two peace officer career paths in our department.
One career path involves limited peace officer authority, limited to the fields of Detentions / Corrections and Courts. These positions typically pay less then the other career path, which involves full peace officer authority and additionally includes the broad law enforcement field.
The entry level positions for these career paths are Detentions/Corrections and Courts Cadet, and Law Enforcement Cadet. One must pass a written exam, physical agility test, a thorough background investigation, a medical exam, a psychological exam, a polygraph (or voice stress analysis) exam, and an oral interview. Once hired, these cadets enter their respective academies. The Detentions/Corrections and Courts Academy, about 10 weeks, is not as long or extensive as the Regional Law Enforcement Academy. I attended the Sheriff’s Law Enforcement Academy in 1978 – it was 21 weeks long. I spent an additional 10 weeks as a trainee in a jail environment, and another 10 weeks of training in a patrol car.
In either case, if one successfully completes one of these academies, they are promoted to either Deputy Sheriff – Detentions / Corrections/Courts, or Deputy Sheriff, respectively, and must pass an 18 month probationary period.
During this time, one can be terminated at any time, essentially with little cause, and are not afforded full due process guarantees that a non-probationary employee receives under the Civil Service system. Once passing probation, one has all of the rights and due process protections afforded under the Civil Service system – they cannot be arbitrarily fired without reasonable cause.
Both of these career paths have promotion opportunities to Sergeant, Lieutenant and Captain at this time, within their separate career path paradigms. A Law Enforcement Deputy Sheriff can promote to higher department ranks beyond Captain, continuing to Commander, Assistant Sheriff or Under Sheriff. In both career paths, after at least two year in a current rank, applications, written exams and oral interviews are required in order to advance.
Experience and performance are also factored in. A list is created, lasting for a year. Typically, at least the top eleven on the list are “certified” for promotion consideration each time a position needs to be filled. A selection board of ranking officers typically makes recommendations to the Sheriff, who makes the decision as to who is promoted.
The process for Captain and Commander are similar, but written exams and oral interviews are not done. Consideration is typically based upon experience and performance, and all applicants are considered for each available position instead of a minimum top eleven on a given list.
The positions of Assistant Sheriff and Under Sheriff are known as “at will” appointive positions.
Unlike the lower ranks, which have Civil Service protections and thus one can only terminated with reasonable cause, these positions do not have these protections. The Sheriff can terminate an Assistant Sheriff or Under Sheriff any time he or she wishes, and for no reason at all. Further, no testing is required for these positions.
Though these positions have traditionally been filled from the Commander (and higher) ranks, the Sheriff can and occasionally does appoint anybody he wishes to these positions – the person does not even have to be a member of the Sheriff’s Department before appointment. Recently, a retired but formerly high ranking person from the FBI was appointed as an Assistant Sheriff.
The positions of Under Sheriff and the lower Assistant Sheriff positions can be compared to presidential cabinet positions. Typically, when a new Sheriff takes office, he appoints his own Under Sheriff, and three Assistant Sheriffs. It may be the previous holders of these positions, or they may all be replaced by an entirely new “cabinet,” as the Sheriff desires.
The position of Sheriff is provided for through the Constitution of the State of California. The Sheriff is an elected position, selected by all voters within the borders of San Diego County (including the voters in all of the cities within the county). Because of this, he is known as the “senior law enforcement officer of the County,” including all of the cities, making his position substantially different than that of a Chief of Police. Police Chief’s are typically “at will” employees appointed by a City Manager, who in turn is appointed by a City Council – the City Manager can fire a Police Chief at any time, essentially without cause.
The Sheriff can only essentially be “fired” by those of us who elect him or her. Furthermore, the Sheriff has the ultimate responsibility to provide law enforcement protection to all of the people of the County. For instance, if a city police department were to become corrupt, or if a city becomes bankrupt and can’t provide police protection because of this, the Sheriff has the responsibility, through his deputies, to step in an provide these services until such time as the police department can be restored. (Note: Each one of us, regardless of our rank, is a “Deputy Sheriff.” Each Deputy Sheriff has all of the power and authority of the Sheriff him/herself – we act with his or her authority in his or her place).

Have you ever had conflicting goals given to you by the government?

This is a very broad question. It depends on what you mean by “goals” and “government.” There are essentially three “levels” of government – local, state and federal. They are not necessarily hierarchal, especially between state and federal. The “plenary” power of the people is actually delegated by the states to the federal government, thus the “power” of the federal government derives from the states (not the other way around). Conversely, the “power” of local government (counties, cities, special districts) is also delegated and authorized by the state, at least in California. Deputy sheriffs (as well as city police officers) are peace officers under state law, and generally have authority anywhere in the state of California, at least for crimes committed in their presence.
All of these government levels are essentially divided into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial – a governmental balancing of power. Peace officers fall under the executive branch along with other criminal justice agencies, such as the District Attorney. The easiest way to envision this is that we are tasked with protecting people by “executing” the law, created by the legislative branch, as interpreted by the judicial branch – and all of these branches are constrained by the United States and California Constitutions.
Within the context of these three branches of government, the answer to your question is DEFINITELY and ROUTINELY, and this answer is also very broad. There are nearly whole law libraries devoted to the ongoing conflicting issues that arise between these three branches of government and the people they serve, a result of this balance of power.
A peace officer must stay abreast of many of these issues through ongoing legal updates and education. For instance, there are currently state statutes and local ordinances that still exist, yet portions of them have been held unconstitutional and thus invalid. Though rare, sometimes laws are enacted that, on their “face,” a peace officer can recognize as being clearly unconstitutional, at least in part (even if it was passed by the electorate).
In such a case, it would be my duty to follow the constitution and not “execute” that law (which can certainly cause conflict with those who voted for it and want it enforced). Usually, however, unconstitutional laws are not clearly so.

 

Copyright© 2007, The Valley Roadrunner